Yet another anti-terrorist program ruined by the New York Times
The NYT is exposing yet another classified program (H/T Polipundit):
WASHINGTON, June 22 — Under a secret Bush administration program initiated weeks after the Sept. 11 attacks, counterterrorism officials have gained access to financial records from a vast international database and examined banking transactions involving thousands of Americans and others in the United States, according to government and industry officials.
The program is limited, government officials say, to tracing transactions of people suspected of having ties to Al Qaeda by reviewing records from the nerve center of the global banking industry, a Belgian cooperative that routes about $6 trillion daily between banks, brokerages, stock exchanges and other institutions. The records mostly involve wire transfers and other methods of moving money overseas and into and out of the United States. Most routine financial transactions confined to this country are not in the database.
Viewed by the Bush administration as a vital tool, the program has played a hidden role in domestic and foreign terrorism investigations since 2001 and helped in the capture of the most wanted Qaeda figure in Southeast Asia, the officials said.
The program, run out of the Central Intelligence Agency and overseen by the Treasury Department, "has provided us with a unique and powerful window into the operations of terrorist networks and is, without doubt, a legal and proper use of our authorities," Stuart Levey, an under secretary at the Treasury Department, said in an interview on Thursday.
The program is grounded in part on the president's emergency economic powers, Mr. Levey said, and multiple safeguards have been imposed to protect against any unwarranted searches of Americans' records.
Similar to other programs, expect the Democrats to start yelling loudly about this just before we find out that a number of them had been briefed and raised no objection.
Will Feingold dust off his resolution calling for Congress to ignore Article III of the Constitution?
I'll have more on this later. But in the meantime, I've started the countdown for the reflexive and robotic automatic declaration that it's illegal from the left blogosphere.
10... 9... 8...
Update (8:50am EST): First entry is this breathless headline at the Huffington Post: "Bank Data Secretly Reviewed By Bush Admin. Without Warrants Or Subpoenas..." - here's a screenshot:

Yet the NYT article that Arianna links to says subpoenas were indeed issued:
Indeed, the cooperative's executives voiced early concerns about legal and corporate liability, officials said, and the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Asset Control began issuing broad subpoenas for the cooperative's records related to terrorism. One official said the subpoenas were intended to give Swift some legal protection.
I suppose reading the article was too much to ask.
1 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Yet another anti-terrorist program ruined by the New York Times.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.dontgointothelight.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/5164
Interesting topic! I really enjoyed your discussion points and plan to share your blog with my friends! I didn't quite agree with everything but I do like to see other peoples points of view. If you want to learn how to get 100% free access to Adult... Read More



Dana Perino, White House Deputy Press Secretary says:
"The President is concerned that once again, The New York Times has chosen to expose a classified program that is working to protect our citizens." Yes, they are traitors, this was a criminal act, and the government should figure out a way to imprison them in Cuba, or a secret CIA prison in Europe. Meanwhile, the rest of us can study
http://www.alternet.org/story/36553/ and try to decide, Gosh,
is the U.S. becoming a police state?
Hey Jerry!
This must sound familiar to you.
Ding..Ding..Ding a Ling!
Thanks for the comment, Jerry.
The AlterNet link? Read it. Speculation, innuendo, outright lies - pathetic and desperate. If your civil liberties have truly been suspended, then I must assume that you're cruising the web from a secret underground location in order to avoid the jackbooted thugs that are chasing you down to slap you in a secret prison in Arizona to keep you from exposing the Diebold voting machine secrets to the press (who are also in hiding, reading your medical records which were leaked to them by the NSA). Being on the lam is hard, huh? Maybe not as hard as changing those wet sheets every morning, but hard nonetheless...
BTW, Jerry, the URL behind your name was a redirect to a different site, I fixed it so that my other readers don't get misled. But I left the "AlterNet" link, it may give a chuckle to others.
From The Right Valley:
Post removed - sole purpose of post was to promote web site.
(Yes, Steve, I got the email as well. I don't mind a little self-promotion mixed in with a comment, but a wholesale cut and paste of your entire blog post without any addition to this blog's discussion is a bit much, don't you think?)